Federer Trick Shot

BLista · Post by **BLista** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:47 pm

Holy Shit

_ _ _ · Post by **_ _ _** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:52 pm

fake? theres something on top of the can you can see it on the second shot

*edit - not a can is it. wtf is it

tobi-wan · Post by **tobi-wan** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:54 pm

hmmm...

Impressive if it's for real.

innocent bystander · Post by **innocent bystander** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:56 pm

it's not a can, it's a bottle.

like that.

findog · Post by **findog** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:59 pm

nah, it's clear on the second shot, if was real the ball would travel way faster

innocent bystander · Post by **innocent bystander** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:02 pm

why couldn't it be real?

sorry, in this case i really do think that it's easier for world class tennis player federer to be able to hit a tennis ball at a target (and it wouldn't have to be at match speed) than to do all that in post production tbh.

mourinho · Post by **mourinho** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:03 pm

finny are you actually doubting the former world number 1's ability to do that?

ag4111 · Post by **ag4111** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:04 pm

As real as jung raping iraqi war children

findog · Post by **findog** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:07 pm

im not saying it couldn't, i just feel it's fake.
he didnt even warmed up, is on a suit and hits it twice?
very unlikely imo

findog · Post by **findog** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:09 pm

the ball speed argument earlier might not be the best, like Phil says he doesn't need to hit lightspeed etc, ill give it that, but something doesn't feel right there.
i been wrong before no problemos etc

Jung · Post by **Jung** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:14 pm

wtf how is it fake?

innocent bystander · Post by **innocent bystander** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:16 pm

findog wrote:im not saying it couldn't, i just feel it's fake.
he didnt even warmed up, is on a suit and hits it twice?
very unlikely imo

world champion tennis player in ability to hit ball shocker.

moderate · Post by **moderate** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:18 pm

it wasn't clear to me that the ball made contact with the bottle, the lighting was bad, there was no slomo action replay. However I'm inclined to believe it wasn't faked.

hippy dave · Post by **hippy dave** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:19 pm

shadows were wrong.

mourinho · Post by **mourinho** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:19 pm

clodhoppa wrote:world champion tennis player in ability to hit ball shocker.

quite

ag4111 · Post by **ag4111** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:20 pm

NuSkepticalBreaks

innocent bystander · Post by **innocent bystander** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:21 pm

hippy dave wrote:shadows were wrong.

but cliff was right.

pesh · Post by **pesh** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:23 pm

clodhoppa wrote:
hippy dave wrote:shadows were wrong.
but cliff was right.

findog · Post by **findog** » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:33 pm

it's fake, notice there's a corner behind the dude, after the 2 hits the balls are practically 1 next to the other, only way i could see that happening would have to be a flat wall parallel to the dudes back and the ball would have to be hit at half speed

here's a couple of examples of the infinite possible trajectories under such conditions

it's fake don't argue.

Federer Trick Shot

Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot

Re: Federer Trick Shot